8jk-=Liberty For Life Association

     C Jefferson

Liberty For Life


Support our advertisers


The World's Leading Strategic Consultancy


The Earth Pan

LFL Founder Out Of Hiding With Extraordinary Solution to fix


The Construct of Live & Origin of Everything - Soulisim


Some The Official Measured Impact of Nuclear Radiation On Humans

LibertyForLife on Patreon

LibertyForLife Store

Make your New Years
Resolution a Revolution
Your Support
Is Greatly Appreciated



real impact of FukushimaReal Impact of Nuclear Radiation Exposure


Donald Weber who extensively photographed Chernobyl and went to photograph Fukushima shortly after the 3/11/11 Nuclear Attack said "I have a feeling that people just don't really understand, they are not grasping the whole scope of the potentiality. I think with the earthquake and tsunami, that was a catastrophe, but you know, it's an engineering catastrophe, we can fix this. But you can't fix what's happening in Fukushima." Donald Weber, Photographer, Post Atomic, Life After Zero Hour, Odaka, Japan 2011

INDEX: What's On This Page:

Another useful article to gague the real impact of what is now the worlds worst & most devistating disaster: Fukushima Timeline

Introduction - the Reality of Radiation, Industry & Government Cover up

People tend to turn away and ignore other people in pain. Understandingly, they want to shut off and ignore disasters & horror. However, when the air you breathe & food you eat contains radioactive particles from a nuclear power plant, you can't really ignore it. Don't ignore the contents of this page & it's implications. Fukushima affects YOU>

The FIRST thing to realize when it comes to deadly isotopes released from Nuclear Power plants that can kill in minuets, is the liability of both the Power Plant owner and the Government who authorized splitting atoms in your neighborhood, continent or hemisphere. Read almost ANY literature touched by the Nuclear Industry & Government & you will quickly realize the extraordinary depth of the lies and disparate attempt to cover up reality.

Numbers (usually doctored or censored) are thrown out using an array of "measurements" with some "authority" verifying something, concluding with the outright claim that radiation never killed anyone. Well, between the lines that is true. It is the cancer which can develop over two to twenty years and more that kills. Or it is heart failure or a multitude of other complications that kill. Even if a person were roasted on the spot by radiation these authorities would deny the fact that radiation is deadly, after all they would be "cooked" & that would be ruled as the cause of death.

It does not take an expert however to realize the impact of radiation, the images themselves are self explanatory, along with the absolute correlation in the number of deaths by cancer along with the mutations & deformations that are rampant in radiation zones.


Paul Fusco documented for all time the reality of nuclear radiation see  Children-of Chernobyl see also Chernobyl Legacy The pictures are in black & white for impact..

A partial list of health effects of human exposure to nuclear radiation:

Impact of Nuclear Radiation

The average person breathes in about 15m3 a day.

"The filters out there for April show that they were breathing in per day about 5 particles. Now these are charged, which is why we call the Fuel Fleas too. And they latch on to lung tissue" Arnie Gunderson, Farewinds Associated, being interview by John King CNN Live

Wave of Radiation from Fukushima Will Be 10 Times Bigger than

All Radiation Is Not The Same

The sun "radiates" you, even bananas "radiate" you, your microwave oven "radiates" your food. Consider thirty seconds in the sun verses thirty seconds in your microwave oven.

Many of the nuclear radiation particles are however vastly more dangerous than your microwave oven. That is why they are "banned" and require massive steel & concrete structures to contain them and highly specialized transport. You can't just pop even a single minuscule molecule of Strontium-90 in your car and drive home with it from the store, it's deadly, and will go on killing for fifty years. Strontium mimics calcium, so your body consumes it and puts it in your bones or teeth, you can't get it out. Cesium-135 mimics Potassium, and your body absorbs it the same way it absorbs Potassium from bananas. Unlike your microwave oven which you zap for a few seconds or a couple of minuets, these nuclear dirty-bombs radiate you with different types of radiation 24 by 7, till they kill you.

Nuclear waste puts something vastly more dangerous than a microwave oven right inside your body.  Cesium-135 is deadly for about four million years, it's "Half-life" is two and a half million years, that is, it is half as deadly in 2.5 million years as when it first came out of the Nuclear Power Plants reactor. These man-made poison effectively kills effectively, forever.

Around one thousand two hundred of the most deadly poisons known to man, are created in the Nuclear Power Plants every day. Nuclear bombs do the same, whether used in a test or in war. More than half the victims of Hiroshima died not from the blast, they died from nuclear-radiation poison. Fukushima is at the very least, worse than three thousand Hiroshima's. Here is a list of a few of the Nuclear Waste Isotope Poisons:

nuclear radiation isotopes

nuclear radiation impact Some of the known types of radiation emitted from nuclear power plant waste & nuclear weapons are deadly Neutrons, Gama rays, Beta rays & Alpha rays. Some will kill in seconds, some may take two, five or even up to twenty years to kill. Either way, the death is excruciatingly painful.

Isotopes like Plutonium do occur in nature, however, in such small amounts that it does not constitute as a practical source of the element. The Plutonium we deal with today is all man-made and is released as highly-radioactive aerosol particles that can be inhaled and "trapped in the deep resperatory tissue of the lung, where, because they are insoluble to human tissue, they can remain for long periods of time and deliver a very intense radiation dose to the surrounding lung tissue. Plutonium is one of the most potent cancer producing agents to man." [ * p.4 ] "There is little doubt from experimental animal studies that the inhaled plutonium is one of the potent resperatory carcinogens known. There is experimental and observed evidence that plutonium concentrations in the lungs of dogs as low as 0.2 microcuries (3 micrograms of Plutonium-329) produce cancer."

"Radiation exposure standards have been established because radiation is known to produce cancer and genetic mutations in  individuals irradiated. The mutations can in turn cause genetic defects in subsequentgenerations." [ * p.6 ]

"An individual can be exposed to radiation from sources that are external to his body as, for example, an X-ray machine or from radionuclides which emit X-ray like radiation deposited on the ground (this occurred with fallout from nuclear weapon tests). Alternately, an individual can be irradiated by internal Sources; that is, by radionuclides incorporated in body tissues. These radionuclides gain entrance into the body through inhalation or through contaminated food or water. Once inside they behave like their non-radioactive counterparts. Radioactive iodine, for example, accumulates in the thyroid gland in the same fashion as stable iodine, and radioactive strontium or calcium accumulate in the bone similar to their naturally occurring non-radio-active counterparts. The radioactive iodine will thus deliver a dosage to the thyroid gland that is many times larger than that to the other organs or to the whole body, and the radioactive strontium and calcium will mainly irradiate the bone." [ * p.6-7 ] "When an X-ray or the radiation emitted by a radionuclide passes through tissue it transfers energy to the cells in these tissues. This energy produces chemical changes in the molecule of the cells; for example, such a chemical change could be a mutation in a gene." [ * p.11-12 ]

It is important to recognize that the impact of radiation was well known in the 1970's & any official or individual who attempts to down-play or even suggest that radiation is harmless is not only a liar, they are committing a very serious criminal act. The above report comes from the National Resources Defense Council, Washington D.C. dated February 14, 1974. relating to Radiation Standards for Hot Particles [ * ]

In the Goiânia accident of 1987, an improperly-disposed-of radiation therapy system from an abandoned clinic in Brazil, was picked up in a junkyard, and the glowing cesium salt sold to curious, uneducated buyers leading to four deaths and serious injuries from radiation exposure. [ * - * ]

The 1989 Kramatorsk nuclear poisoning incident when a small capsule caesium-137, probably part of a measurement device from the late 1970's, was accidentally mixed into concrete in a wall of an apartment building in Kramatorsk, Ukraine. Over 9 years, two families lived in the apartment. By the time the capsule was discovered, 6 residents of the building had died from leukemia and 17 more had received varying doses of radiation. [*]

"one hundredth of a milliliter (a very small amount of liquid) would have been sufficient to produce sarcomas (cancer) in animals." - that's 0.01 milliliter and about 8 to 16 micro grams  of Pu-239 [ * p.B1 ] - the report goes on to state "In fact, the biological evidence strongly suggests that man is more sensitive (than animals)". "At issue here are quantities below 0.06 µCi and, hence, well below  the detectable limit (at the time)"

into the atmosphere, making

The horrific irony of these radioactive isotopes is that their creation by the bankers and power companies, is utterly unnecessary. The BAR Association Judges, Freemason Gang & Jesuit Gang, are used to eliminate any engineer who develops the numerous free-energy technologies that in no way harm the environment. You can run your engine on water (H2O vs. H2C) just like Stanley Milgram demonstrated and was murdered for; you can use a magnetic motor which generates electricity simply with magnets; you have enough sunshine hitting your roof to power your entire home (Solar-cells are simply made out of silicon which is just sliced from a big 'sand' crystal, the power companies however have made sure they are extremely expensive).

There never was any dangerous "background" radiation on earth, during the known history of mankind, apart from digging into a mountain with uranium. It was only when these greedy criminals who dictate the use of fossil & nuclear fuel started forcing the use of nuclear power & nuclear weapons, that "background radiation" levels increased along with cancer caused by nuclear radiation fallout.

Newspapers Door-to-door surveys revealed clusters of Fukushima residents with persistent nose bleeds, diarrhea. Fallout refugees talk about bizarre rashes, high fevers, more (report from 2011). According to this article, most Fukushima nuke plant workers ineligible for free cancer checks

Hot Particles

"a hot particle is a particle that contains sufficient activity to deliver at least 1000 rem/yr to the surrounding lung tissue. For isotopes having half-lives greater than one year, this would correspond to particles containing at least 0.07 pCi of alpha activity." [ * p.48 ]

A risk of cancer equal to 1/2000 per hot particle" [ * p39 ] -

The 1970 occupational exposure standard for uniform whole body irradiation was an unacceptable 5 rem/year and for the lung 15 rem/year * p42 "The Federal Radiation Council suggests the use of the arbitrary assumption that the majority of individuals do not vary from the average by a factor greater than three. Thus, we recommend the use of 0.17 rem for yearly whole-body exposure of average population groups. (It is noted that this guide is also in essential agreement with current recommendations of the NCR and the ICRP.) It is critical that this guide be applied with reason and judgment. [ * p45 ] the report goes on to state "Strict adherence to these guidelines implies that the ambient air standard should be zero particles 80".

The government here is accepting one in a thousand will be murdered by the Nuclear Power Industrial Cartel, the authors of the report state that were it only acceptable to murder one in ten thousand: "80/ Had we based the standard on 1/10,000 risk per particle, the MPLPB would have been one particle and this problem would not exist." - i.e. the standards would require not one single Hot-Particle be ever emitted from a Nuclear Power Plant. Recognize in Tokyo people were breathing 10 Hot-Particles a day and in Seattle 5 Hot-Particles a day from Fukushima as openly published on CNN. Other more hidden reports indicate that the number of Hot-Particles they tersely call "fuel-fleas", breathed by people all over the Northern Hemisphere amounts to the slow death sentence of a billion or more beings.

The fact that inhaling alpha emitting particles causes cancer, is irrefutable. It is a slow death sentence.

It is important to understand that these scientists and government officials are playing statistics with death. You can not average out an individual particle amongst two, ten, a hundred or a million people. A particle is a particle & whomever inhales it, has a death sentence.

It is just as important to understand that Nuclear Power and Weapons are UTTERLY AND TOTALLY UNNECESSARY. It is just as important not understand that the Freemason Gang is tasked with the responsibility of eliminating any engineer or company that develops environmentally friendly free-energy. The WHOLE purpose of the Nuclear Industrial Complex is to enslave and exterminate mankind.

A hot particle of Plutonium-239 at the lower limit activity contains only 0.07 pCi [* p42]

Thus, the recommended MPLPB (Maximum Permissible Lung Particle Burden) for occupational exposure from hot particles of alpha-emitting radionuclides in the deep respiratory zone is 2 particles." [ * p43-44]

"In fact, since an individual is exposed to whole particles, any non-occupational exposure to hot particles would be an overexposure." [ * p44]

The report goes on to state "Hot particles deposited on land and surfaces can be resuspended into the air by any number of means, including wind, automobile traffic, human or animal movements." [ * p.48 ] Experiments showing how Plutonium and other particles are easily resuspended into air are discussed and the report goes on to say "we offer the admonition that the exposures should be kept as far below these guidelines as is practicable."

Here are some relevant excerpts from the above quoted report

"The page you requested does not exist. For your convenience, a search was performed using the query hss office health safety security."

epa - epa - nrdc -

Inhaling 5 or more "hot particles" (as defined below, and including Plutonium, for example) is a huge amount compared to the maximum recommended dose based on research at the time. Cancer risk is extremely high.

"we recommend that the MPLPB for members of the public be 0.2 hot particles, and the average lung burden for members of the public be 0.07 hot particles, a factor of 3 less than the maximum." (p. 45)

[it is recommended that...] For accidental releases exposure (10 CFR 100.ll(a) (l)) MPLI’B (2 hours exposure) = 10 hot particles" (p. 52)

"[...]the existing biological evidence strongly suggests
that an insoluble particle of respiratory tissue represents a risk of cancer induction of between 1/1000 and l/10,000." (p.41)

[regarding experiments with Beagles exposed to Pu 239]:
"All of these experiments involved intense exposures and a significant level of carcinogenesis. Severe damage and disruption of tissue were associated with the exposures. The most relevant lung experiment is Bair’s Pu 23902 inhalation study with beagles. Exposure was to particulate of 0.25 u or 0.5 u median diameter; burdens were in the uCi range. Twenty of the 21 dogs that survived more than 1600 days post exposure had lung cancer. Many of these cancers were multicentric in origin. The cancers again appeared in conjunction with severe lung injury. Since the natural- incidence of the disease is small, it appears that at this level of exposure the induction of lung cancer is a certainty durinq the normal beagle life span. At the same time,
time, since the pathological response is saturated in this experiment, it is inappropriate to draw any inference about the magnitude of the response at smaller burdens. The smallest burden (at death) in a dog showing lung cancer was 0.2 uCi. Presumably this would correspond to a particle burden of about 10^7 particles. Burdens which are smaller by orders of
magnitude may still induce a substantial incidence of cancer. Indeed, the cancer risk may, as for skin and soft tissues, correspond to a risk per particle in the neighborhood of 1/1000 to 1/10,000."

In 2006, The Environmental Protection Agency issued a report addressing the National Resorces Defense Council, Washington D.C. dated February 14, 1974. relating to Radiation Standards for Hot Particles [ * ] What is interesting is the EPA only wrote this "counter report" in 2006. The EPA 2006 report firstly completely mischaracterizes the NRDC analysis & draws absurd conclusions. The EPA statement at the beginning of their 2006 report titled "Health Effects of Alpha-Emitting Particles In The Respiratory Tract" EPA 520/4-76-013, perhaps best encapsulates the essence of their report:
EPA Cop Out

The shocking manner in which the 2006 EPA analasys is written and disregard to the original text, provides an indictment of this Banker Controlled EPA & Washington D.C. Government. The types of conclusions the EPA report reaches, amount effectively to the claim that radiation damage caused by alpha particles is so catastrofic, that it kills everything, and that therefore because the cells are dead, they can not be cancerous (page 8). At the top of page 9, the EPA report makes the correct observation that the types of poison produced from Nuclear Power Plant Waste are wide and varied (which is pointed out in the 1974 NRDC analysis), however, the back-ass conclusion the EPA then makes is that the likely exposure a person recieved would not be exclusively Plutonium, and "Thus, it is verry difficult to assess the helth effects that could result from such an exposure".

On page 9, second column, the EPA then goes on to make the statement "Since absorption of transuranics from particles in the gastrointestinal tract is usually much less than 0.1% [37], nearly all particles cleared from the respatory passages to the gastrointestinal tract are excreted." - i.e. they are trying to say that radiation breathed in is farted out.... all of it.. is what they are hinting at.. The EPA hot air continues, 2nd last paragraph on page 9: "Interpretation of experimentally-deterined clearance curves indicates that plutonium oxide particles are probably cleared from the tracheobronchial region with a half-time of up to about 3 days [38]". What a bunch of fucking cod-wallop!!!! Good God! Are these the imibaciles we are depending on to determine radiation "quota", "limints" & "half-time"!!!!

On the next page 10, the EPA then quotes a study of the "Estimates of the retention half-time of plutonium in the lungs of human beings accidentially exposed to plutonium aerosols range from about 300 to 650 days [39]". So you can immediately multiply their idiotic half-time plutonitum atoms are in your lungs by 2... What the fuck EPA????? Is there a referee blowing the wistle "half-time boys, take a break now".... What the fuck is half-time???? The same fucking nuclear crap speak to try to make the Radioactive life of Plutonium-239 only half of what it's 48,200 years is, a half life of 24,100 years?  They have a stdy showing plutonium remains in the lungs for 600 days (1 year 9 months) to 1,300 days (3 years 7 months), so they "half-time" it, then tell us the ICRAP recommends the value of 500 days be used for radiation protection purposes!!!! (Forgive the literay leway of adding another A in ICRP, with the EPA B.S. fiture we can half-time it....)

At the end of Page 10 onto 11, the EPA makes the conclusion that Plutonium kills everyting, but only in a small radious, so it hypothetically does not kill much. However, they made the assumption in the page before that it only took 3 days to clear (which they then multiplied to 300 & 650 days "half-timed" in the previous page), however, if the plutonium which kills everything on-contact is merely "passing through" and being farted out, then everything in its path is killed instantly for 3 days and 500 half-timed days....

"Because the basic mechanisims of carcinogenesis are still essentially unknown, a discussion of this subject can give little insight into the hot particle problem", the EPA study goes on.. However, when it gets to the Animal section on page 12 & on, the EPA is left with little "fart-space" and "half-timing". The irrefutable and sad fact is that radiation experiments have been conclusively carried out on aminals & radiation is very effective at killing them. How the EPA and any Nuclear Industry expert or Government official can attempt to suggest that humans are not killed just as efficiently, or more so as in some indications, than animals, is hard to fathom.

After recognizing radiation kills animals, the EPA report again attempts to back-fart & half-time the issues. Consider this on page 13, end of first paragraph, second column:  "The analysis also shows that all the lung cancer deaths in the Battelle group were readily attributed to the absorbed lung dose from the alpha radiation. In other words, if there is a hot particle effect the beagle experience indicates that it is dwarfed by the effect of the generalized alpha irradiation the dogs experienced." - The hot particle effect is alpha radiaion!!! And beta & gama as well. The EPA attempts to trick the reader into "dwarfing" the verry hot-particle effect concluded in the experiments!

The EPA then goes on to again misqote the NRDC report by Cochran and Tamplin who clearly defined "a hot particle is a particle that contains sufficient activity to deliver at least 1000 rem/yr to the surrounding lung tissue. For isotopes having half-lives greater than one year, this would correspond to particles containing at least 0.07 pCi of alpha activity." [ * p.48 ]. The EPA report makes up other definitions in an attempt to detract from 1/2000 people will die from one hot particle, and pushes the line to to 0.6 pCi for a "Type 2" hot-particle. The EPA then makes up "650 letal lung cancers" and "100 lethal lung cancers". Excuse me, are these dogs, cats on steroids with more than 9 lives? Is not the first letal lung cancer lethal?

The report goes on on page 14 revealing how the EPA & their Nuclear Nutcase Banksters cover up deaths: "It is important to realize that the actual number of primary lung cancers in an animal is not directly observable, even at autopsy, because lung tumore frequently metastasize, producing multiple foci which cannot be distinguished from multiple primary tumors." - i.e. the dog's did not die from nuclear radiation they metastasized-died... The report then goes on along the lines of the multi-lived dog's and draws an astonishing 1/670,000 death rate from some fantacy land. And they conclude "Therefore it is concluded that if there is a hot particle effect the lung cancer risk per particle has not only been greatly overestimated but, more importantly, such a risk is small by comparison with the lung cancer risk attributabel to the generalized alpha radiation."  Need we only say that all the dogs died from lung cancer, at this point of analizing the EPA cop-out, may brain cells are dieing off with frustration.

On the final page of the EPA cop-out, they attempt to contradict conclusions - 2nd column 2nd paragraph: "Data on the relative frequencies of different tumor types in uranium miners and Japanese atomic bomb survivors suggest that the radiosensitivity of the bronhial epithelium for cancer induction may be greater that that of the alveolar or bronchiolo-alveolar tissue".... ok, thank you... however in the next paragraph the EPA states "Since plutonium is not known to have caused lung cancer in human beings, we do not know where such cancers might originate." - SHIT. These EPA criminals literally go on and write the legal cop-out for the Nuclear Power & Weaons Cartel to file in any court where someone challenges these criminals for the death of their loved one. The Nuke Lawyer will quote the EPA as emphatically concluding that "plutonium is not known to have caused lung cancer in human beings" - what a fucking lie.  However, there is a simple solution, the EPA Staff responsible for this report, need to be put in the same Beagle study group, to put their conclusion to the test, naturally, they have absolutely no reason to object.

The fact that the EPA document is being written with the clear intent to downplay the serous and dangeours impact of radtion, is rediculously obvious, and exposes the EPA of engaging life on earth and themselves engaging in criminal acts, to cover up the Nuclear Industrial Complex's crimes. You Mr. & Mrs. Citizen, need to also comprehend that they made you pay for the EPA Cop-Out Cover-up Report EPA 520/4-76-013, to protect the Queen of England's Uranium mines & the Bankers Nuclear Power Companies & use of Depleted Uranium Weapons in the invasion of countries the baners did not own. These Old World Order governments that call themselves the New World Order, use your money to enslave & kill you, your family, and the rest of the planet. One can hardly grasp the nature of the individuals who prepared this EPA cop-out report. It would be worthwile to simply determine who amongst the EPA committee are Freemasons.

A Queens Ransom

nuclear radiation birth defects

Oh, and just by-the-by, one of the primary "beneficiaries" of the nuclear-power holocaust, is the Queen of England. She owns most of the mineral rights to the otherwise useless uranium ore on the planet. And, oh, just encase you missed the news, the International Red Cross records Stalin was hiding, prove beyond any doubt the so-called Jewish Holocaust by Nazi Germany is a TOTAL LIE & fabrication by Zionatzi Jews who have murdered hundreds of millions of Russians, Chinese, Koreans, Iraqi's & other population groups. 

However as with Fukushima, the real Holocausts are not only ignored by "their goverment" & main-streem Freemason owned media, anyone who talks or writes about them, is prosecuted by government officials. The very reason for the Jewish Holocaust Hoax, was to set up Israel in the Nation of Palestine, to trigger world War Three. Isis-Ra-El, "Israel", is certainly being put to "godly" use....

The very purpose of the four religions Rome invented out of Soli Invictus, namely, Christianity, Judaism, Islam & Satanism (Luciferianism), is to stupefy & to divide & conquer mankind.

The Trinity Gods of Evil's Axis, Isis-Ra-El - Israel

Isis-Ra-El "Israel", was established after World War Two on Palestinian territory, pursuant to Freemason & Jesuit Albert Pike's Plan, for the very purpose of sowing hatred & division to instigate World War Three. As in the 9/11 terrorist attack, Isis-Ra-El (Israeli) Mossad Terrorists were employed to carry out the 3/11 Fukushima Terrorist Attack & Global Genocide.

See these two new articles on Liberty For Life regarding 9/11: Ashkenazi Zionatzi Freemason Jesuit Jews Carried Out  9/11 and 9/11 Banksters Murder To Steal Assets & Russia - A Zionatzi Sacrifice. We are working on articles regarding the Zionatzi involvement in the 3/11 Holocaust. Also see these articles by Jim Stone: http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html -  http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/natnewsfearporn.htmlhttp://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukureport1b.pdf

Official Measured Impacts of Nuclear Radiation On Humans:

Source: “Percent Increase in Cancer Incidence, Cancer Mortality, and Other Health Effects of Human Exposure to Ionizing Radiation”fukushima baby

  1. 1500% increase in incidence of testicular and ovarian cancer in children on Navajo reservation in uranium mining area
  2. 500% increase in bone cancer in children affected by uranium
  3. 250% increase in leukemia (all ages) in the Navajo population
  4. 200% increase in each of the following non-cancer effects: miscarriage, infant death, congenital defects, genetic abnormalities, learning disorders.
    Baseline for 1-4: Navajo residents living near Uranium facilities were compared to Navajo residents in non-uranium areas
  5. 500% increase in birth defects when compared to the national average.
    (Southwest Research and Information Center. “Uranium Legacy.” The Workbook, v 8, no 6. Albuquerque, NM: 1983)
  6. 400% increase in leukemia incidence in the population living downwind of the Pilgrim nuclear power reactor in Massachusetts in the first 5 years after fuel was know to have leaked excess radioactivity.

    nuclear babyBaseline: Disease in population before and after Pilgrim radioactive releases and comparison to upwind population. (Morris M. Knorr R. The Southeastern Massachusetts Health Study 1978-1986-Report of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. October 1990. See also: Clapp R. Cobb S. et al. “Leukemia Near Massachusetts Nuclear Power Plant.” Letter in Lancet. December 5, 1987)


  7. 300—400% increase in lung cancer in the general population within the plume of the Three Mile Island accident releases
  8. 600—700% increase in leukemia in the general population within the plume of Three Mile Island accident releases
    Baseline: Disease in population upwind (out of the radiation plume path) is compared to disease in population downwind (in the pollution plume.)
    (Wing S. Richardson D. et al. “A Reevaluation of Cancer Incidence Near the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant: The Collision of Evidence and Assumptions.” Environmental Health Perspectives, v 105, no 1. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, Maryland. January 1997)
  9. 50% increase in childhood cancer incidence in the Three Mile Island area for each 10 millirem increase in radiation exposure per year.
    Baseline: Children living with different radiation levels are compared for evidence of disease. (Hatch M. et al. “Background Gamma Radiation and Childhood Cancers Within Ten Miles of a US Nuclear Power Plant.” International Journal of Epidemiology, v 19, no 3. 1990) 



    Further effects found in victims of the Chernobyl accident less than ten years after the meltdown

  1. 500% increase in thyroid cancer in Ukrainian children.
  2. 75% increased incidence of heart disease
  3. 200% increase in respiratory and digestive disease
  4. 200% increase in birth defects
  5. 200% increase in spontaneous abortions

    Baseline: Comparison of population health before and after the Chernobyl explosion
    (Rupert J. “Illness Tied to Disaster Still on Rise.” The Washington Post. June 24, 1995. The reporter was quoting Britain’s Imperial Cancer Research Fund, The Ukrainian Health Ministry and the United Nations.)

  6. Chernobyl Children8000% increase in thyroid cancer in Belarussian children living near Chernobyl, reported 6 years after the meltdown.
    Baseline: Comparison of population health before and after the Chernobyl explosion. (Hudson RL. “Child Cancers Found to Rise Near Chernobyl.” The Wall Street Journal. September 3, 1992.
    The article they quote was published in Nature on the same day and was researched by the World Health Organization
    Populations which were particularly exposed to radiation
    by the Chernobyl catastrophe
    •     Clean-up workers (liquidators):
          830,000 (Yablokov 2010)
    •     Evacuees from the 30 km zone and other highly contaminated zones:
          350,400 (Yablokov, 2010)
    •     The population of the heavily irradiated zones in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine:
          8,300,000 (Yablokov, 2010)
    •     European population in zones with minor exposure to radiation:
          600,000,000 (Fairlie, 2007)

    nuclear radiation


  7. 63% increase in leukemia incidence among workers at Oak Ridge National Laboratories(US) who received very low doses of external (gamma) radiation on the job.
  8. 123% increase in leukemia incidence in the same population where there were also very low internal doses of radioactivity
    Baseline: Cohort comparison of worker deaths and radiation exposure levels
    (Wing S. Shy C. et al. “Mortality Among Workers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Evidence of Radiation Effects in Follow-up Through 1984.” JAMA, v 265 no 11. March 20, 1991)
  9. 80% increase in eight types of cancer deaths in Department of Energy atomic workers exposed to external doses of radiation.
    Baseline: Various baselines. Usually cohort comparison of workers with various doses and their deaths from resulting diseases were used.
    (Mancuso TF. Stewart A. Kneale G. “Radiation Exposures of Hanford Workers Dying From Cancer and Other Causes.” Health Physics, v 33. Pergamon Press, Great Britain. November 1977)


  10. 200% increase in leukemia in children of atomic workersneclear impact
    Baseline: The parents of children with cancer were compared for occupation to discern if those adults who worked with radiation had more children with cancer than those who worked in other jobs.
    (Roman E. et al. “Case-control Study of Leukemia and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Among Children Aged 0-4 years Living in West Berkshire and North Hampshire Health Districts.” BMJ 1993 #306)
  11. 287% increase in cancer incidence in children of nuclear workers who received internal radiation in England
    Baseline: The parents of children with cancer were compared for occupation to discern if those adults who worked with radiation had more children with cancer than those who worked in other jobs.
    (Sorahan T. Roberts PJ. “Childhood Cancer and Paternal Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: Preliminary Findings From the Oxford Survey of Childhood Cancers.” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, v 23: 343-354. 1993)
  12. 250% increase in all cancers among atomic workers.
  13. 190% increase in leukemia incidence
    Baseline: General Population
    (Kendall. GM. et al. “Mortality and Occupational Exposure to Radiation: First Analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers.” BMJ v 304: 220-5. 1992) 

  14. FRANCE

  15. 500% increase in childhood leukemia in children visiting the beach once a week near the French nuclear reprocessing facility at LaHague
  16. nuclear baby760% increase in childhood leukemia if they ate the local fish regularly
  17. 345% increase in childhood leukemia associated with drinking well water from the vicinity of the nuclear facility
    Baseline: Observed leukemia cases were compared to expected leukemia cases.
    (Viel JF. Pobel D. Incidence of Leukaemia in Young People Around the La Hague Nuclear Waste Reprocessing Plant: A Sensitivity Analysis.” Statistics in Medicine, v 14: 2459-2472. 1995)
  18. 1200% increase in all cancers exist around the Sellafield, (formerly Windscale) reprocessing facility and of these.
  19. 600-1000% increase in leukemia of children whose fathers were exposed to certain amounts of radiation prior to conception
  20. 1000% increase in lymphoma was found in children near a reprocessing facility in Cumbria
    Baseline: Local and Area Controls
    (Gardner et al. “Results of Case-control Study of Leukemia and Lymphoma Among Young People Near Sellafield Nuclear Plant in West Cumbria.” BMJ v 300. February 17, 1990)
  21. 1000% increase in leukemia incidence in children living near a nuclear reprocessing facility
    Baseline: Children of the same age in the same area prior to the facility’s operation.
    (Heasman et al. “Childhood Leukemia in Northern Scotland.” Lancet, v 1:266. 1986)
  22. 27.3% increase in all cancer deaths among atomic workers exposed to internal doses of radiation
    Baseline: Comparison of worker deaths and radiation exposure levels.
    (Morgenstern H. Froines J. Epidemiologic Study to Determine Possible Adverse Effects to Rocketdyne/Atomics International Workers from Exposure to Ionizing Radiation. State of California Health and Welfare Agency. June 1997) nuclear baby
  23. 500% increase in leukemia among Utah nuclear bomb test Downwinders
  24. 121% increase in thyroid cancer incidence in the same group
  25. 200% increase in breast cancer
  26. 700% increase in bone cancer
    Baseline: Utah Mormons exposed to bomb fallout are compared to all Utah Mormons.
    (Johnson CJ. “Cancer Incidence in an Area of Radioactive Fallout Downwind From the Nevada Test Site.” JAMA, v 251 n 2: 231-6. January 13, 1984)
  27. >120% increase in thyroid cancer in those who drank milk laced with Iodine-131 from atmospheric nuclear weapons tests
    Baseline: Estimated cases are based on dose reconstruction where estimated exposures were between 6-112 rads per individual child in the bombs’ plumes.
    (Ortmeyer P. Makhijani A. “Let Them Drink Milk.” The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Nov/Dec. 1997)
  28. 200% increase in lung cancer in women who received radiation treatments for breast cancer
    Baseline: Breast cancer patients treated with radiation were compared to those who were treated only by other methods.
    (Bishop JE. “Study Links Breast Cancer Treatment to Higher Risk of the Disease in Lungs.” The Wall Street Journal, May 14, 1993: B6)
  29. 66—96% increase in early cancer deaths due to background radiation
    Baseline: Deaths of children living with different radiation levels are compared for cancer.
    (Kneale GW. Stewart AM. “Childhood Cancers in the UK and their Relation to Background Radiation.” Radiation and Health. 1987)

This list was compiled by Cindy Folkers & Mary Olson on 4/24/98, Nuclear Information & Resource Service, 1424 16 th St, NW Suite 404, Washington, DC 20036 (202)328-0002 -- it is arbitrarily based on what studies are on file at NIRS. 

Other Sources of Information on the impact of Nuclear-Radiation on Humansnuclear impact

"Atomic Suicide The Tale of The Sailors & the Seals" by
dead fukushima sealsChristina captures the essence of what Radiation Sickness is all about in her well written article. Covering the impact on the crew of USS Ronald Reagan who were exposed to a few weeks of "Fukushima". USS Ronald Regan was called to assisted in humanitarian efforts known as “Operation Tomodachi”, to aid Fukushima victims. Tomodachi means ‘friend’. Senior Chief Michael Sebourn recalls the radiation in the air measuring 300 times higher than what was considered safe, 60,000 cpm off the helicopter intakes. The crew carried out their mission, and followed orders. Weeks later, they needed to go into port for supplies, however, because a large number of people on the ship were very sick, “Japan didn’t want us in port, Korea didn’t want us, Guam turned us away. We floated in the water for two and a half months [until Thailand took them in]" “People were sh -tting themselves in the hallways.”

Navy personnel began experiencing more severe and mysterious symptoms, including hemorrhaging and cancer. Sebourn, now spends his days going from one specialist to another. After seeing at least 10 doctors and undergoing three MRI’s and two ultrasounds, he still doesn’t know what’s wrong. Sebourn says he very suddenly lost 50 to 60 percent of the power in the right side of his body. This shocked him when he walked into the gym one day and could only do his workout on his left side – he says his right side just didn’t work.

Administrative Officer Steven Simmons was on the USS Ronald Reagan too. Simmons suddenly lost 20 to 25 pounds, started running fevers, getting night sweats and tremors, and his lymph nodes started to swell. He can no longer use his legs and spends all of his time in a wheelchair. His weakness has traveled up to his core and arms, and the signals between his brain and his bladder have failed. He uses a catheter every four hours. Other sailors have been diagnosed with immune system failure, blindness and ocular cancers, testicular cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer, and brain cancer.

“As for the people who are saying those levels weren’t very high, chernobyl "animal"normal background radiation, I call bogus to that, because I was the man taking the background levels. If you think 300 times higher than a normal day’s radiation level is fine, then I don’t know what to tell you” says Seybourn.

Former U.S. Navy Officer Steven Simmons said: “I don’t understand how you can place a ship the size of a carrier into a nuclear plume for over five hours, suck up contaminants into the water system of the ship, and expect there to be no harm whatsoever to the human life?” You could go one step further to say: “I don’t understand how you can endlessly dump hundreds of tons of highly radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean for 3 years straight and not expect to have 'no harm whatsoever' to everything that lives in the sea?”

The US canceled their health registry a few months after the sailors returned from their mission, stating: “After extensive environmental monitoring and analysis, it has been determined that none of the nearly 70,000 members of the [Department of Defense] affiliated population … are known to have been exposed to radiation at levels associated with adverse medical conditions.”  - Read the rest of Christina's article here, it is worth the read.

All things in nature die normally by slow expansion. Radioactivity is multiplied expansion—These killers are the invisible metallic death rays which penetrate every cell of your body with ultra-microscopic poison metal bullets at speeds of around 160,000 miles per second.” – Walter and Lao Russell, “Atomic Suicide”

Impact on "Other Humans"

by WashingtonsBlog - “Absolutely Every One” – 15 Out of 15 – Bluefin Tuna Tested In California Waters Contaminated with Fukushima Radiation - source

28 May 2012 "Bluefin tuna record Fukushima radioactivity" - "Researchers have found elevated levels of radioactivity in pacific Bluefin tuna caught off the coast of California that can be tied directly to the Fukushima incident." "Nicholas Fisher, a professor of marine sciences at Stony Brook University in New York says he was 'stunned' to find the radioactive signal in bluefin tuna" source

Since the summer of 2011 all infant orca whales born in the waters of the American Pacific Northwest have died in their first year of life, or soon thereafter. source

2015-04-04 "Feds likely to shut down sardine fishing on West Coast" "West Coast fisheries managers will likely shut down sardine fishing this year as numbers decline, echoing a previous collapse that decimated a thriving industry and increasing worries that other species might be withheld from the commercial market." source 1 - source

2014-08-30 ENENEWS: “Surge in marine mammal strandings” on US West Coast — Scientists: “This is very weird”; “My biggest fear is if this… is everywhere” along coast — Whales, dolphins, sea lions, birds recently washing up in large numbers — Many thousands likely dead — Violent seizures shown on news - source

ABC: ‘Mysterious surge’ in sick marine mammals all along California coast — Infested with parasites, extremely emaciated; “Very seriously ill… in very bad shape” — Experts: “We’re extremely concerned right now” — Deaths up 1,500% at rescue facility — ‘Number mystifies officials’ source

There have been widespread reports of mysterious injury to Alaskan seals. 

Scores of dead and sick ringed seals — some with open wounds, unusual hair loss and internal ulcers — … began washing up in summer 2011 in Western Alaska.

"If the seals did ingest radiation, much of it would have been excreted out of the body before the testing of the carcasses that occurred several months after the incident." - Doug Dasher, researcher with the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

The closure of a herring fishery off Western Australia's south coast source

Brian Williams, anchor: Environmental officials in California say there’s been another highly troubling report about what’s going on in the Pacific.  Something is killing the starfish and they don’t know why. They have been dying in record numbers on the West Coast. […]

Pete Raimondi, marine biologist: It’s happened so rapidly that some species are just missing. […]

Miguel Almaguer, reporter: An epidemic affecting waters from Alaska to Southern California causing millions of starfish to fall apart and melt away. […] Two species that used to thrive here have now vanished. […]

Raimondi: I’ve had probably 100 emails thus far saying, ‘Well, what about Fukushima, because of radiation?’ We haven’t ruled that out yet, but we’re clearly not ruling that in.

Radioactive News

The Banana Bullshit

Disparate to quell any realistic public reaction to their genocide radiation plans, the Illuminatzi Governments come up with smiling talking two-faced authorities that attempt to flat out deceive the public. Lies & deception are the "art forms" their Freemason Mainstream Media has mastered. Some foods like banana's, contain small amounts of radioactivity, the ratio however to what nuclear-power plants produce is three units to three trillion units when comparing banana's to nuclear-waste. Obviously, the impact on human cell tissue is also as vast.

2 grams of Cesium roughly compares to 20 TONS OF BANANAS - we suppose if you ate 20 tons of bananas you would also have a problem or two... The radiation intercity in Cesium & more than a thousand other particles emitted from nuclear power plant disasters, is utterly different to that of a banana.


ELEMENT/MINERAL Amount of 'natural' radiation Radiation Bq (bullets) fired per second
1 Gram Natural Potassium (K) 0001117 K40 30
1 Gram Cesium 137 (C137) Radioactive Mimic 0 3,200,000,000,000
1 Gram Rubidium 87 (87Rb) Radioactive Mimic 0 49,000,000,000
1 Gram Potassium 40 (K40) Radioactive Mimic 0 265,200

Nuclear Power-Plant contamination emits harmful ionizing radiation such as alpha particles or beta particles, gamma rays or neutrons. The degree of hazard is determined by the concentration of the contaminants, the energy of the radiation being emitted, the type of radiation, and the proximity of the contamination to organs of the body. Man made cesium mimics natural potassium found in a banana or a fish. The huge danger is that the human body does not reject the potassium-mimicking cesium & absorbs it into the body. Bones, testicles, breasts, thyroids and other critical parts of the body are ambushed by this cesium and the thousand plus other radioactive nuclear isotopes in nuclear-waste. Even in low quantities such as 10-50 Bq/kg can be deadly.

See: Dr. Conrad Miller MD report - Cesium Radiation Accumulates Over Time Inside Human Beings To Lethal Levels

See:  Negative Health Effects Of Man Made Highly Radioactive Potassium 39, 40, 41, Rubidium And Cesium, Compared To Natural Potassium Mineral Found In Nature

You will not see birth defects or physical problems caused by children or adults eating bananas. To try to down play the impact of the Illuminatzi Zionist nuclear fuel & Depleted Uranium weapons, is as deceptive as telling someone they will get a ticket to a nirvana if they believe blood from a sacrifice will wash away all their sins. When anyone attempts to downplay the dangers of radioactivity by using bananas, you know you are dealing with a demon in disguise. You might just as well ask them to tell you what god says about radiation. Their advice is as advisable as that of a religious nut case with voices in their head.

Potassium content of our bodies seems to be under homeostatic control, when you eat a banana, your body's level of Potassium-40 doesn't increase. You just get rid of some excess Potassium-40. The net dose of a banana is zero, however, the net dose of Cesium is deadly. source 

While Cesium-137 mimics Potassium, Strontium-90 mimics Calcium, tricking your body to absorb these deadly particles into your bones & teeth where you can not get them out, & sentencing you to a nasty death.

Radioactive rain causes 130 schools in Korea to close — Yet rain in California had 10 TIMES more radioactivity

The Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS) said radioactive iodine and cesium were found in rainwater collected in the early morning at a checkpoint on an island. The concentration level of iodine-131 was 2.02 becquerels per liter (Bq/l), that of cesium-137, 0.538 Bq/l, and that of cesium-134, 0.333 Bq/l. They shut down all their schools and told the children to stay inside. source: 1 - 2 

Expert Studies on Impact of Nuclear Radiation

External exposure to ionizing radiation produces DNA damage and increases the rates of cancers such as thyroid, lung, and breast cancers and leukemia [5]. The most dramatic effect on physical health resulting from exposure to fallout from the Chernobyl disaster has been an increased incidence of thyroid cancer. These thyroid tumors have a particularly high rate of rearranged during transfection (RET)/PTC rearrangements (57–67%, mainly PTC3). source

K. Hamatani, H. Eguchi, R. Ito et al., “RET/PTC rearrangements preferentially occurred in papillary thyroid cancer among atomic bomb survivors exposed high radiation dose,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 17, pp. 7176–7182, 2008. sources: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4

M. C. Mahoney, S. Lawvere, K. L. Falkner et al., “Thyroid cancer incidence trends in Belarus: examining the impact of Chernobyl,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1025–1033, 2004. sources: 1 - 2 - 3

The thyroid gland of children is especially vulnerable to the carcinogenic action of ionizing radiation. To provide insights into various modifying influences on risk, seven major studies with organ doses to individual subjects were evaluated in five cohort studies. source see also 1 - 2

See also International Advisory Committee. The International Chernobyl Project. Technical Report. IAEA, Vienna (1991). &  "Chernobyl Facts & Figures" source also see "CNN Chernobyl Children" source and source.

Chernobyl and Fukushima Research Initiative, presented at the International Ornithological Congress in Tokyo, August 2014
A four year study & research reveals radiation, including at low-levels, from the Fukushima site is having an extreme adverse effect on biodiversity and wildlife populations. This contradicts Volume I of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation’s report, “Levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 great east-Japan earthquake and tsunami.” ALL the evidence totally contradicts the rediculous United Nations & New World Order governments & Nuclear Industry reports. “Contrary to governmental reports, there is now an abundance of information demonstrating consequences (i.e. injury) to individuals, populations, species, and ecosystem function stemming from the low dose radiation due to the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters,” - Timothy Mousseau, Professor Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina and researcher for the Chernobyl and Fukushima Research Initiative. [* - *]


March 24, 2009: "As the thirtieth anniversary of America’s most infamous industrial accident approaches, we mourn the deaths that accompanied the biggest string of lies ever told in US industrial history. As news of the accident poured into the global media, the public was assured there were no radiation releases. That quickly proved to be false. The public was then told the releases were controlled and done purposely to alleviate pressure on the core.  Both those assertions were false.   The public was told the releases were "insignificant.""  source


In the interest of "National Security"? Your Government Wants to Kill You... Culling the human population... the problem is not over-population, it is criminal bankers & their governments...

Liberty For Life
C MenuVert

If you appreciate the extraordinary effort put into LibertyForLife.com please
click here to support us on Patreon

Wearing the LibertyForLife.com brand is more than a fashion statement, it’s not only cool and sexy, you’re supporting a revolution for truth and liberty. Wear it with pride.

Make your New Years Resolution a Revolution.

The Earth Plan's Peopleisim  is THE Solution to the Worlds Problems do IT!