Combating Terrorism.
"Generally, terrorism is born out of bad politics and not
bad people." - SOC
“Terrorism cannot be stopped with violence, that only
breeds more terrorism. Terrorism can only be eradicated by removing the root
cause of the terrorism, generally political policies.” -
SOC
While it might be necessary to react with violence to a
terrorist event, violence will not combat terrorism in the long run, violence is
only likely to breed more terrorism.
Like any disease, terrorism requires a host with a suitable
breeding ground. As with any competent diagnosis, it is critical to identifying
the disease, the host and what makes the disease multiply. Much of our current
methodologies employed to combat terrorism look more like the ancient medical
treatment of bleeding the patient - bomb the bastards. The bombing only spreads
the disease.
To properly combat terrorism one must first identify then
eliminate the root cause.
Box cutters brought down the Twin Towers on 9/11/2000.
There was no major investment in weapons, little if any espionage and not much
training required. No bank wire transfer or identity document would have
prevented the attack. If the U.S. Government had the ultimate control of all
banking, if everyone carried National ID Cards, the Twin Towers would still have
come down.
One must ask why the U.S. government & the IRS through
their henchmen, the OECD, immediately after the 9/11 Twin Tower attack
immediately embarked on a world wide clampdown on competing financial markets?
Why did the U.S. government pass the treasonous Patriot Act? Why did the U.S.
government create a new Police Entity called “Homeland Security”, where the
Secretary of Homeland Security (Office of the SHS) has broad reaching powers
similar to the German Nazi SS. Perhaps the new department of Homeland Security
aught to be called the Faderland Securiteit, and it’s officers should wear SS
badges.
The 9/11 Twin Tower Attack is a classic example of grossly
incompetent management of the problem. It was immediately evident that 15 out
of the 19 Hijackers were Saudi Nationals. The authorities completely brushed
over the overwhelming fact that eighty percent of the terrorists came from Saudi
Arabia. Instead, the U.S. went off and bombed Afghanistan and Iraq, displacing
both those countries governments who according to all legitimate sources, had
little if anything to do with the 9/11 Twin Tower Attack. Such a grossly
incompetent diagnosis raises question to the intent and integrity of the U.S.
government. The more frightening factor is what results from the complete
misdiagnosis. Why do Saudi Nationals want to attack the U.S.A.?
The burning hatred of the U.S.A. by Komanie's followers in
Iran should bear some historical perspective. For years the U.S.A. propped up
the Sha of Iran, a man who history has proven was vehemently hated by the people
of Iran. Overnight the U.S. interests in Iran went to a negative scale because
our politicians chose to sponsor a Iranian tyrant and not win the hearts and
minds of the people of Iran. History proves the U.S. political handling of Iran
was utterly incompetent, such incompetence in the commercial field in the U.S.,
would result in at least the immediate firing of the management team who so
pathetically botched the 'account'.
In Chile, the CIA went well out of their way to sponsor a
coup of a popular democratically elected government, placing in power a tyrant
who has been responsible for murdering around 200,000 innocent people.
In Iraq, the U.S. sponsored mass murderer, providing the
helicopters and even anthrax that was used to gass the Curds. That year the
U.S. gave Sadam Hussen Five Hundred Million Dollars, to show Sadam what a good
boy he was for implementing the slaughter, the U.S. gave him a bonus of One
Billion Dollars the next year. You can imagine Sadam's surprise after he acted
on the letter he received from his friends in the U.S. government stating that
the U.S. won't do anything if he sorts out his Kuat problem. But then, that did
give the U.S.A. OIL Men the excuse of 'rescuing' Kuat's oil wells.
After the Desert Storm spanking, Sadam was careful not to
play with any of the weapons of mass destruction the U.S. provided him, however,
that did not help. Somehow, Sadam got the blame for what one of his arch
enemies, Osama Bin Laden did, the 9/11 attack. But then, the Bush family
does have close ties to the Bin Laden family and the U.S.A. OIL Men had the opportunity to
rescue Iraq's oil wells from "weapons of mass deception" in Operation Iraqi
Liberation.
Can this seriously be taking place? Are two hundred and
fifty million Americans so blind? Don't they care? Don't they see the
obvious? Who's the terrorist?
By bombing Afghanistan and Iraq, we have murdered thousands
of innocent people and bread more hatred than Komeni could muster through a
distorted Muslim message. It is almost as though the U.S. government wants to
breed terrorists to replace the chilled Cold War Threat, which insiders of the
CIA and KGB let on was kept 'hot' well beyond any reason or time.
Defense contracts around the USA were being cancelled and
military bases were being shut down after the Berlin wall fell and the Cold War
ended. The world had entered a new era of peace, the Internet Revolution
promised global connectivity and opportunity. However, six months after the B2
Bomber Contract was cancelled (an aircraft that costs two billion dollars each),
the U.S. invaded Kuat. Next, the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and then Iraq after
Saudi Terrorists with family ties to President Bush, brought down the Twin
Towers.
The Saudi Government Puppets the U.S. props up must be
getting nervous, their OIL wells are even more attractive and the Saudi
nationals are clearly restless.
No invader survives without winning the hearts and minds of
the people. The OIL Men's greed for black gold will swallow them and hopefully
not the rest of US.
To prevent any internal uprising, the U.S. Government
quickly passed the Patriot act and initiated the Police State "Homeland
Security" Project.
There are two primary systems of law in western society,
British Common Law (On which the USAs Founding Fathers raised the flag) and
Roman Dutch Law. The primary difference between these to legal standards is
that in British Common Law, one is "innocent until proven guilty"; All the
tyrants such as the Nazi government, Stalin, the Apartheid Driven Government of
South Africa and the IRS, choose the the other standear, the principal of
"guilty until proven innocent" of Roman Dutch Law.
There could be no more treasonous overthrow of the U.S.
Constitutional basis of British Common Law as the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act
goes well beyond what any tyrant implemented through Roman Dutch Law, with the
Patriot Act, one is "guilty without the right to prove innocence"! No regime,
no dictatorship, no tyrant has ever passed such an utterly outrageous law as the
U.S.A's Patriot Act.
The People of the United States of America must ask if they
want to combat terrorism or if they want to eradicate it. Because with current
U.S. trends the people of America will be spilling a great deal of blood
combating terrorism because the root cause is the government of US.
See also: U.S. National Security;
Congress' War Declaration Rights;
Anti Gun Lobby and
2nd Amendment |
