|
There is a saying in Washington D.C.: "Forget the crime, it's the
cover-up which causes the real damage". If someone with a mission statement that reads: “To make the world a
better place, showing respect for all creation, while operating with
complete integrity, for it is in God we trust.”, someone who was
actually making good on the mission, can be so viciously and maliciously
treated by our government, then perhaps the only question remaining is
when will it be your turn?
Chronicling
the Malicious Prosecution of Clive Boustred following the attempted
murder of Mr. Boustred by Santa Cruz Sheriffs: After
shooting at Clive and his children and missing, the sheriffs realized
that neighbors were watching. Next they closed Clive in his garage
and assaulted him there after Clive showed the Sheriffs the TRO he had
just filed. What followed has been the ongoing malicious
prosecution of Clive so as to silence Clive: 2 False Felonies; 9 False
Misdemeanors; 7 False Cases; 4 False Arrests; 2 Sham Trials; around 100
or so Sham Hearings; 5 Months False Imprisonment:
Next - As Clive learns to defend himself from false criminal charges,
absurd Civil cases are filed against Clive.
- Gate Crashers who intend to crash Clive's party and get in a fight
before they get there sue Clive.
- Twin Lakes Church Attack - Astonishingly,
TLC who initiated the second false arrest of Clive on the eve of the 6th
month anniversary of the sheriffs shooting at Clive, presumably, to prevent
Clive from filing claims against the county, files a second case against
Clive. This time to prevent Clive from communicating with his children
and any members of the Church. The Church schedules the trial on
Halloween. They lost.
Opening Brief
This documents some of the sham trial Mr. Boustred was given showing
where evidence proving his innocence is intentionally withheld from the
jury by the judge, the prosecutor's malpractice and Mr. Boustred's
testimony literally being struck from the record by the judge. The
judge who was a nationally renowned criminal, was rated as "not
qualified" by California's Judicial Nominations Committee - regardless
our courts allow such criminals to preside with criminal action and
intent over cases.
Opening Brief |
3rd Lawsuit filed against the State: Following the State's refusal to
follow the law and pay out on Liberty For Life Chairman's first two
lawsuits, Mr. Boustred and the companies he represents have filed a 3rd
lawsuit to collect on the first two and to press charges that were not
addressed in the first two suits. Access the Lawsuit in
Word
Format here and HTLM
here
 UNDER
DEVELOPMENT NOTE
NOTE: The extensive length the Government went to
in order to maliciously prosecute Clive covers seven cases spread across
California. The amount of information available to expose the
extraordinary criminal nature of the Sheriffs, District Attorneys,
Judges and Commissioners fills fining cabinets of information.
Coupled with Clive's emotional and simple capacity limitations, the
ability to keep this section up to date is tough to say the least.
Please forgive typing errors and missing sections, they will be
completed as soon as they can. Currently the government has locked
up Clive's assets and is attempting to drive Clive into bankruptcy.
..."He ran up to the door of my car, aimed
and fired. The slug slammed into the door next to my shoulder.
Had he hit his mark, my head would have exploded and my little boys
sprayed with a shower of their dad’s blood, brains and shattered skull.
Considering that he missed, there was just as much a chance of the
slug ripping apart my little boy’s bodies. He raised his gun to
take a second shot, I screamed “stop shooting, stop shooting” -
Clive Boustred.
The Red Arrow indicates the location of Clive's vehicle at his home
where the Santa Cruz Sheriffs tried to murder him.
At 14:42 Hours on March 10, 2003, from point blank range, Deputy Sheriff Michael
Macdonald shot at Clive Boustred who sat unarmed, not threatening any
one or anything in his car in the driveway of his home. William aged three was sitting
just behind his dad in the deputy's direct line of fire, Richard aged
seven was two feet off the line of fire.
"The first question people ask in the U.S., is
where did this happen? I tell them that it happened at my home in
Santa Cruz, California. For those who have not had a brush with
the system, a look of disbelief crosses their face." - Clive
Boustred
However, what you
will learn is that there is no denying by the authorities that they
tried to blow Mr. Boustred's head off. The Sheriffs admitted in open court and in
their police reports that they shot at Mr. Boustred and his children.
Perhaps they realized that they could not contradict the third party
witnesses or the damage to the door of Mr. Boustred's vehicle where the round hit.
The next obvious question is why did they shoot?
|
