Liberty For Life Association

     C Jefferson

Liberty For Life

CONTENTS

Support our advertisers

Hire STRATEGIZE.com

The World's Leading Strategic Consultancy

STRATEGIZE CONSULTANCY


The Earth Pan

LFL Founder Out Of Hiding With Extraordinary Solution to fix
Government:
Peopleisim.org

Peopleisim


The Construct of Live & Origin of Everything - Soulisim

Soulisim



ADVERTISE HERE:

 

InfoTelesys Lawsuit Index; Parties.

Plaintiffs, USDC: 08 00546 Trial By Jury
Clive Boustred
Petitioner, In Propria Persona Sui Juris
210 Suncrest Dr,
Soquel, CA 95073
Tel: +1 (408) 889-4351
clive@libertyforlife.com

                                                                                 

 

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

 

Clive Frank Boustred,

RCB (minor son of Clive Frank Boustred),

WFB (minor son of Clive Frank Boustred),

InfoTelesys, Inc. Nevada and Nevis

Get IT Real, Inc. Nevada and Nevis

Life Yacht, CopperCards, Santa Cruz Cats, Le Essence, Kite Yachts.

PLAINTIFFS,

     v.

Government and County of Santa Cruz, Government and State of California, Government of the United States of America, Agents of the New World Order. (Individual DEFENDANTS such as Irwin Joseph are listed in the complaint), John Does 1 to n.

DEFENDANT(S).

 

CASE # 08 00546 Trial By Jury

 

FIRST AMENDED OPEN COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS AND COURT RULES AND PETITION TO THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES TO CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

x 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1985, 1986, 1988, 1961, 1962, 1964.

x Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

x 18 USC § 1, 241, 242, 2382

x 19 U.S.C. § 1961-68

x Constitution of The United States of America

x English Common Law

x 11th Amendment U.S. Constitution

AND PURSUANT TO OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS AS SO DETERMINED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

DEMAND FOR ALL ADJUDICATION IN FACT AND LAW BY JURY;

DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY.

 

With Good Cause Plaintiffs bring this suit before the United States District Court in San Jose for Trial By Jury. 

Having been literally shot at by the government, repeatedly falsely arrested, given sham trials and sentenced to absurd sentences for non crimes, having had his children literally violently kidnapped and held hostage and having has as many as seven of his businesses destroyed by the government, and having repeatedly been refused any right to address grievances, to satisfy exhaustion of remedies, PLAINTIFFS bring new matters and matters that the courts refused to address to the court in an attempt to find integrity in the courts.

Complaint submitted under duress, without the means to afford counsel as a consequence of nearly five years of outrageous malicious prosecution that shocks the conscience.

INDEX

A. PARTIES 8
PLAINTIFFS 8
DEFENDANTS 8

B. SYNOPSIS OF CASE 17
PREVIOUS LAWSUITS 20
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 20
1ST LAWSUIT – U.S. Dist. Ct. Case # C05 000996 21
2nd LAWSUIT – U.S. Dist. Ct. Case # C07 00391 21
The Net Result of Continued Criminal Behavior by Government Officials 22

C. VENUE 25
Intradistrict Assignment. 25

D. JURISDICTION 25

E. AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS OR PREJUDICE 26
AUTHORITIES 27

F. SUFFICIENCY OF CLAIM 34
NO STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS 35
NO JUDICIAL POWER IN THIS CASE 35
PRO SE LITIGANTS ENTITLED TO WIDE LATITUDE 36

G. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 38

H. PREAMBLE - GOVERNMENT OUT OF CONTROL IN THE CONTROL OF FOREIGNERS 40
SETTING THE STAGE OF OPPRESSION IN THE UNITED STATES 46
U.S.A. Worlds Worst Prison State 49
FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS Blowing up Buildings & Murdering Citizens To Incite War & Eliminate Liberty 57
U.S.A. Illegally Invading other Nations 62
U.S.A. Outwardly Aggressive By Nature, Murdering Millions 64
Dictatorial & Fascist By Definition: 64
U.S.A. Creating the Worlds Worst Ecological Disasters 65
U.S.A. Maiming Millions and Killing Thousands, Tens of Thousands and Hundreds and Thousands of Their Own Citizens 67
Socialist In Taxation & Law But Not In Services: 70
Illegal Tender Conspiracy: Stealing Real Assets With Illegal Tender Created Out of Noting 73
Criminal Civil Courts 78
Consider Who & What You Work For 78

I. CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED / CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED 80
First Claim For Relief Fraud by Jeremy Fogel 80
Second Claim For Relief Fraud by James Ware 82
Third Claim For Relief Fraud by Richard W. Wieking 84
Fourth Claim For Relief Aggravated Battery and Aggravated Assault 86
Fifth Claim For Relief Battery and Assault 88
Sixth Claim For Relief Misprision of Felony – Irwin Joseph 89
Seventh Claim For Relief Treason – Irwin Joseph 90
Eighth Claim For Relief Aggravated Kidnap / Kidnap / Parental Alienation 93
Ninth Claim For Relief Treason – Jeremy Fogel 110
Tenth Claim For Relief Misprision Of Felony – Jeremy Fogel 112
Eleventh Claim For Relief Conspiracy 113
Twelfth Claim For Relief Intentional Negligence 119
Thirteenth Claim For Relief Liable / Defamation of Character 120
Fourteenth Claim For Relief Slander 122
Fifteenth Claim For Relief Intentional/Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, Fraud/Deceit, Wrongful Civil Proceedings / Abuse of Process 124
Sixteenth Claim For Relief Wrongful Civil Proceedings / Abuse of Process 127
Seventeenth Claim For Relief Violation of U.S. Const. 1st Amendment Freedom of Speech 128
Eighteenth Claim For Relief Violation of U.S. Const. 2nd Amendment [Right to Bear Arms] 130
Nineteenth Claim For Relief Conversion / Grand Theft Auto / Trespass 133
Twentieth Claim For Relief Disparagement Of Business Reputation Or Property, Interference With Business Relations, Pure Economic Loss, Intentional Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage, 135
Twenty-first Claim For Relief Treason – James Ware 136
Twenty-second Claim For Relief Misprision Of Felony – James Ware 138
Twenty-third Claim For Relief Misprision Of Felony – Attorney General & Santa Cruz County Sheriffs, Counsel & Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors 139
Twenty-fourth Claim For Relief Misprision Of Felony – Phyllis J. Hamilton 141
Twenty-fifth Claim For Relief Misprision Of Felony – Troy B. Overton 142
Twenty-sixth Claim For Relief Misprision Of Felony – M. M. Schroeder 144
Twenty-seventh Claim For Relief Misprision Of Felony – TRILLA E. BAHRKE 145
Twenty-eighth Claim For Relief Misprision Of Felony, Alienation of Parental, Kidnap – William Kelsay 146
Twenty-ninth Claim For Relief Misprision Of Felony – Jeff Almquist 148
Thirtieth Claim For Relief Burglary 149
Thirty-first Claim For Relief Armed Robbery 150
Thirty-second Claim For Relief Extortion 151
Thirty-third Claim For Relief Public Nuisance 153
Thirty-fourth Claim For Relief Racketeering 155
Thirty-fifth Claim For Relief Mixed War 156
Thirty-sixth Claim For Relief Fraud - Banking 164
Thirty-seventh Claim For Relief Usury Banking 193
Thirty-eighth Claim For Relief Treason - Banking 194
Thirty-ninth Claim For Relief Conspiracy - Banking 197
Fortieth Claim For Relief Violation of U.S. Const. 7th Amendment [Trial by Jury, Common Law] 199
Forty-first Claim For Relief Violation of U.S. Const. Article III Judicial Department Responsibility 201
Forty-second Claim For Relief Violation of U.S. Const. 8th Amendment: excessive fines, cruel & unusual punishment 203
Forty-third Claim For Relief Violation of U.S. Const. 5th Amendment [Criminal proceedings, deprivation of life, liberty and happiness] 206
Forty-fourth Claim For Relief Malicious Prosecution 208
Forty-fifth Claim For Relief Fraud by Santa Cruz Sheriffs & DA 213
Forty-sixth Claim For Relief Racketeering 215
Forty-seventh Claim For Relief Misprision of Felony – U.S. Attorney General 215
Forty-eighth Claim For Relief Forty-ninth, Fiftieth and Fifty-second Claim For Relief - Treason, Fraud, Extortion And Racketeering - Tax 219

J. DAMAGES 226

K. COMMON AUTHORITIES 229
Constitution for the United States of America 229
STATUTES OF LIMITATION DO NOT APPLY 247
MISPRISION OF FELONY 247
EVERY PERSON LIABLE FOR CRIMES UNDER COLOR OF LAW 247
PROCEEDINGS OUTSIDE OF COURT AUTHORITY ARE VOID 248
PARENT CAN SUE FOR INTERFERENCE WITH PARENTAL RIGHTS 248
FEDERAL COURT HAS JURISDICTION ON DIVORCE CLAIMS 248
CUSTODY MAY BE CHANGED IF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ABRIDGED 248
U.S.C. SECTION 1738A AND 42 AND 654, 663 249
CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE KIDNAP 249
FEDERAL COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER CUSTODY MATTERS 251
CUSTODY IS A CONSTITUTIONALLY SECURED RIGHT – ENABLING FEDERAL JURISDICTION 253
EX PARTE HEARINGS ON CUSTODY ORDERS UNCONSTITUTIONAL 253
IF MOTHER HAS BOYFRIEND CUSTODY AWARDED TO FATHER 253
FATHER HAS RIGHT TO CUSTODY 253
JUDGES CRIMINALLY LIABLE FOR WILLFUL DEPRAVATION OF CUSTODY RIGHTS OR ANY CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION 254
MUNICIPALITY AND SATE MAY BE SUED 257
POLICE OFFICERS NO IMMUNITY 257
ATTORNEY’S CAN BE SUED 257
THE COURT HAS A DUTY TO ENSURE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 258
EVIL ORDERS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL 258
JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED 258
VOID ORDERS 258
NON-LAWYERS ENTITLED TO COURT 258
PRO SE TO BE CONSIDERED WITHOUT TECHNICALITY 258
PROHIBITION OF BIAS 259
DIRECTORS, THE REAL PARTY OF INTEREST IN CORPORATIONS ENTITLED TO 1ST AMENDMENT SELF REPRESENTATION 260
CUSTODY MATTERS DICTATE DUE PROCESS 261
CUSTODY AND CALIFORNIA CODES 262
DUE PROCESS DICTATES GOOD CAUSE 262
DUE PROCESS DICTATES AN IMPARTIAL JUDGE AND FAIR TRIAL BY JURY 264
DUE PROCESS DICTATES COMPETENT AND SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: 264
DUE PROCESS DICTATES FAIRNESS: 265
Due Process, Fair Hearing & Trial By Jury LAW DEFINED 267
VOID JUDGMENTS MUST BE SET ASIDE 276
DUE PROCESS 277
NOTICE AND HEARING. 280
RIGHTS, INTERESTS, BENEFITS, OR PRIVILEGES IN GENERAL 284
IN REGARD TO CALIFORNIA’S “NO-FAULT” DIVORCE 286
TRIAL IN GENERAL 287
FEDERAL COURT 288
SHAM TRIALS 290
DISCLOSURE AND DISCOVERY; NOTICE OF DEFENSE. 290
BIAS AND PREJUDICE GENERALLY 294
QUALIFICATIONS, ACTIONS, AND COMMENTS OF JUDGE, JURY, OR PROSECUTOR. 294
HABEAS 295
RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE; WITNESSES. 296
INSTRUCTIONS 297
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL 298
NECESSITY IN GENERAL. 299
ADEQUACY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF REPRESENTATION. 300
MATTERS CONSIDERED; PRESENTENCE REPORT. 302
DISCRIMINATION AND VINDICTIVENESS; SENTENCE ON RETRIAL. 303
EXECUTION OF SENTENCE. 305
IMPRISONMENT AND INCIDENTS THERE OF. 305
PARDON AND PAROLE. 305
FAIR JUDGE 306
NOTICE AND HEARING 307
SPEEDY HEARING RIGHT 308
DUE PROCESS 253(1). Nature in general 311
DEPRIVATION OF LIFE OR LIBERTY IN GENERAL. 311
CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS 314
PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION AND COMMITMENT. 318
CONFESSIONS, STATEMENTS, AND ADMISSIONS 321
PROMISES OR OTHER INDUCEMENTS; THREATS AND FEAR. 322
RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY 322
JUDICIAL ERROR. 323
HABEAS CORPUS 323
JURISDICTION 324
LAW SUIT 324
RE: CORPORATION 325
RELATED TO STATE OR STATE ACTION. 326
INCORPORATION OF BILL OF RIGHTS 327
RE: CHILDREN 327
RE: PRISONERS: 330
LIBERTIES AND LIBERTY INTERESTS PROTECTED. 331
FEDERAL COURT 334
PHOTO COPY. 334
DURESS AND COERCION 334
DISCRIMINATORY ENFORCEMENT OF LAW 334
ENTRAPMENT 335
RESISTANCE 337
SELF-DEFENSE 338
FORMER JEOPARDY 341
EFFECT OF SETTING ASIDE OR REVERSING CONVICTION AT DEFENDANT'S REQUEST 342
JURISDICTION 344
ARREST AND DETERMINATION 344
ARREST WITH A WARRANT 345
ARREST WITHOUT A WARRANT. 346
REASONABLE OR PROBABLE CAUSE 348
MANNER OF MAKING ARREST 351
USE OF FORCE 351
RESISTANCE TO ARREST 353
BAIL 354
TEMPORARY DETENTION 355
CITATION FOR INFRACTION OR MISDEMEANOR 359
CUSTODY AND DISPOSITION OR ARRESTEE OR PRISONER 360
SEARCH AND SEIZURE 363
WHAT CONSTITUTES “SEARCH” “OR SEIZURE” 372
SEARCH WARRANTS 374
SEARCHES OF PREMISES OF EFFECTS 390
VEHICLE SEARCHES 390
IDENTITY OR BEHAVIOR OF OCCUPANT 392
CONSENT 394
SCOPE AND MANNER OF SEARCHES AND SEIZURES 394
PARTICULAR TYPES OF SEARCHES AND SEIZURES 395
SEARCH & SEIZURE REMEDIES 395
CIVIL ACTIONS 396
CRIMINAL PROSECUTION 397
PERSONS LIABLE 398
EXTRAORDINARY WRITS 398
PRESUMPTIONS; BURDEN OF PROOF 399
BARGAIN WITH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 403
BAIL AND RECOGNIZANCE 403

L. PRAYER FOR RELIEF 413

M. DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY 413

N. VERIFICATION 414

 

JURY NOTICE[1]:  Just as the courts consider kidnap a serious offense punishable even by death, PLAINTIFF’S also consider it in the same light.  Let it be judicially noticed that the government has violently and unlawfully kidnapped Plaintiff Clive Boustred’s children RCB and WFB and has held them hostage for nearly five years following the attempted murder of Clive Boustred by the Santa Sheriffs Cruz Shooting instructor who shoot at Clive Boustred from a point blank range of five to seven feet with WFB aged three at the time and RCB aged seven at the time also in the line of fire.  The Courts have consistently and abrasively refusing to follow the Law, Code and Rules, while maliciously assaulting and falsely prosecuting Plaintiff.

What must be done when a good and peaceful person such as Clive Boustred files in a U.S. Courts a plea “that I have been shot at had my children kidnapped and have been maliciously prosecuted to cover up, please help!” and cannot get any relief what so ever, other than more severe abuse from the government?  The government who after attempting to murder Clive Boustred literally violently kidnapped Clive Boustred’s children RCB and WFB and handed his children to Mr. Boustred’s adulterous ex wife and former Personals Assistant Stefan Tichatschke a man and woman of ill repute, despite a lawful stipulated custody agreement and order dictating that Tichatschke may have no contact with RCB and WFB and despite a stipulated custody agreement where the children lived with their father Mr. Boustred.  To cover up the attempted murder, the government repeatedly threw Clive Boustred in jail under absurdly false charges wile locking down Clive’s finances so that he could not afford to defend himself. To this day the government continues to hold RCB and WFB hostage from their dad Clive Boustred.  Clive is the custodial parent, by law RCB and WFB lived with their father – yet a criminals acting as judges and commissioners in the Santa Cruz Superior Court, under the color of law, without any lawful right or reason, maliciously ordered that Clive Boustred not communicate with his children for three years.

 

A. PARTIES

PLAINTIFFS

1.                  Clive Frank Boustred,

2.                  RCB (Minor son of Clive Frank Boustred)

3.                  WFB (Minor son of Clive Frank Boustred)

4.                  InfoTelesys, Inc. Nevada and Nevis

5.                  Get IT Real, Inc. Nevada and Nevis

6.                  Life Yacht. Nevis

7.                  CopperCards. California

8.                  Santa Cruz Cats. California

9.                  Le Essence. Nevis.

10.              Kite Yachts. Nevis

DEFENDANTS

1.                  Defendant MICHAEL MACDONALD/Michael Macdonald

resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Deputy Sheriff.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

2.                     Defendant SAMUEL S. STEVENS/Samuel S. Stevens

resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Superior Court Judge.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

3.                  Defendant STEVE DROTTAR/Steve Drottar

resides or works at Santa Cruz District Attorneys Office, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as an Ass. DA.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

4.                  Defendant ANAMARIA TICHATSCHKE/Anamaria Tichatschke/ (Formerly Anamaria Boustred)

resides or works at 33250 Fairway Ave, Soquel, CA 95073 as a house keeper

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual o official capacity.

5.                  Defendant STEFFAN TICHATSCHKE/Steffan Tichatschke

resides or works at 33250 Fairway Ave, Soquel, CA 95073 as an investor

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual o official capacity.

6.                  Defendant VICKI J. PARRY/Vicki J. Parry

resides or works at 100 Doyle Street, Suite G, Santa Cruz CA 95062 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar 80508.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

7.                  Defendant MARK TRACY/Mark Tracy and Santa Cruz Sheriffs

resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Sheriff.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

8.                  Defendant ART DANNER/Art Danner (Deceased)

resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Superior Court Judge.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

9.                  Defendant M POOL/M Pool

resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Deputy Sheriff.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

10.              Defendant HEMMINGWAY/Hemmingway (Deceased)

resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Lieutenant Sheriff.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

11.              Defendant AMY CHRISTY/Amy Christy

resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Sergeant Sheriff.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

12.              Defendant BROZOZOWSKI/Brozozowski

resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Deputy Sheriff.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

13.              Defendant BOB LEE/Bob Lee

resides or works at Santa Cruz District Attorneys Office, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a District Attorney.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

14.              Defendant MICHAEL E. BARTON/Michael E. Barton

resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Superior Court Judge.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

15.              Defendant GREGOR GUY SMITH/Gregor Guy Smith

resides or works at 214 Duboce Ave, San Francisco, CA 94103-1008 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

16.              Defendant PAUL MELTZER/Paul Meltzer

resides or works at 511 Water Street, Santa Cruz CA 95060 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

17.              Defendant TRILLA E. BAHRKE/Trilla E. Bahrke

resides or works at 2501 North Lake Blvd, P.O. Box 5609, Tahoe City, CA 96145 as a Superior Court Commissioner.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

18.              Defendant  BILL DOYLE/Bill Doyle

resides or works at 2501 North Lake Blvd, P.O. Box 5609, Tahoe City, CA 96145-5609 as a Ass. District Attorney.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

19.              Defendant CHRISTOPHER M. CATTRAN/Christopher M. Cattran

resides or works at 2501 North Lake Blvd, P.O. Box 5609, Tahoe City, CA 96145-5609 as a Ass. District Attorney.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

20.              Defendant BARBARA J. FOX/Barbara J. Fox

resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Clerk of the Court.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

21.              Defendant GRIFFIN/Griffin

resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Deputy Sheriff.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

22.              Defendant ROBERT FRANDEEN/Robert Frandeen

resides or works at 125 Water Street, Suite C, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

23.              Defendant RAVEN HARRIS/Raven Harris and Child Protective Services

resides or works at Santa Cruz Santa Cruz Child Protective Services. 100 Pioneer Street P.O. Box 1320, Santa Cruz, CA 95061

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

24.              Defendant ANGELA GLASS/Angela Glass and Child Protective Services

resides or works at Santa Cruz Santa Cruz Child Protective Services. 100 Pioneer Street P.O. Box 1320, Santa Cruz, CA 95061

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

25.              Defendant Mary Olimpo

26.              Defendant ROBERT B. ATACK/Robert B. Atack

resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Superior Court Judge.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

27.              Defendant GENWORTH FINANCIAL/Genworth Financial

resides or works at representation at 1299 Ocean Avenue, Suite 900, Santa Monica, CA 90401-1000 as insurance agents

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

28.              Defendant EDMUND G. BROWN/Edmond G. Brown/STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL/Attorney General of The State of California/ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

resides or works at P.O. Box 944255, Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 as Attorney General of The State of California

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): ¨ individual x official capacity.

29.              Defendant IRWIN JOSEPH/Irwin Joseph

resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Commissioner.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

30.              Defendant JASON M. HEATH/Jason M. Heath/State Bar No. 180501 and Santa Cruz County/SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

resides or works at Santa Cruz County 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as an Attorney

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

31.              Defendant PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON/Phyllis J. Hamilton and the Government and associated entities of United States of America responsible for instituting the position and acts of said Defendant.

resides or works at 450 Golden Gate Ave, San Francisco, CA 940102 as a U.S. District Court Judge.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

32.              Defendant JEREMY FOGEL/Jeremy Fogel and the Government and associated entities of United States of America responsible for instituting the position and acts of said Defendant as a United States District Court Judge.

resides or works at the U.S. District Court 280 S. 1st Street, San Jose, CA as a United States District Court Judge

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

33.              Defendant WILLIAM M. KELSAY/William M. Kelsay

resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Superior Court Judge.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

34.              Defendant JEFF ALMQUIST/Jeff Almquist

resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Superior Court Judge.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

35.              Defendant HEATHER MORSE/Heather Morse

resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Superior Court Judge.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

36.              Defendant BARRY BASKIN/Barry Baskin

resides or works at Contra Costa County Superior Court, Contra Costa CA. as a Superior Court Judge.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

37.              Defendant M. M. SCHROEDER/M. M. Schroeder and the Government and associated entities of United States of America responsible for instituting the position and acts of said Defendant.

resides or works at United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth District, San Francisco as Chief Judge.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

38.              Defendant JAMES WARE/James Ware and the Government and associated entities of United States of America responsible for instituting the position and acts of said Defendant.

resides or works at the U.S. District Court 280 S. 1st Street, San Jose, CA as a United States District Court Judge

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

39.              Defendant RICHARD W. WIEKING/Richard W. Wieking and the Government and associated entities of United States of America responsible for instituting the position and acts of said Defendant.

resides or works at the U.S. District Court 280 S. 1st Street, San Jose, CA as a United States District Court Clerk

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

40.              Defendant DENNIS J. KEHOE/Dennis J. Kehoe

resides or works at Dennis J. Kehoe Law Corp. 311 Bonita Drive, Aptos, CA 95003 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

41.              Defendant Dennis J. Kehoe Law Corp.

resides or works at Dennis J. Kehoe Law Corp. 311 Bonita Drive, Aptos, CA 95003 a corporation.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

42.              Defendant JOHN A. CHRISTERSON/John A. Christerson

resides or works at Dennis J. Kehoe Law Corp. 311 Bonita Drive, Aptos, CA 95003 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

43.              Defendant MARK SPURLOCK/Mark Spurlock

resides or works at Twin Lakes Baptist Church, Inc. 2701 Cabrillo College Drive, Aptos CA 95003 as an Administrator

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

44.              Defendant LEONARD DUECK/Leonard Dueck

resides or works at Twin Lakes Baptist Church, Inc. 2701 Cabrillo College Drive, Aptos CA 95003 as Vice President

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

45.              Defendant Twin Lakes Baptist Church, Inc.

A corporation at Twin Lakes Baptist Church, Inc. 2701 Cabrillo College Drive, Aptos CA 95003 a corporation

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

46.              Defendant CHASE CARD SERVICES OF WILMINGTON DELAWARE/Chase Card Services of Wilmington Delaware.

resides or works at P.O. Box 15298 Wilmington DE 19850-6600a corporation

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

47.              Defendant TROY B. OVERTON/Troy B. Overton

resides or works at P.O. Box 944255, Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 as Deputy Attorney General of The State of California

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

48.              Defendant PAUL T. HAMMERNESS/Paul T. Hammerness

resides or works at P.O. Box 944255, Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 as Supervising

Deputy Attorney General of The State of California

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

49.              Defendant PAULA SIMMONS/Paula Simmons

resides or works at Twin Lakes Baptist Church, Inc. School 2701 Cabrillo College Drive, Aptos CA 95003 as School Principle

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

50.              Defendant DANA MCRAE/Dana McRae/State Bar No. 142231 and Santa Cruz County/SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

resides or works at Santa Cruz County 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as an County Counsel, Santa Cruz County

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

51.              Defendant G. DAVID GENOCHIO/G. David Genochio

resides or works at Santa Cruz District Attorneys Office, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as an Ass. DA.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

52.              Defendant M. MCCONNELL/M. McConnell

resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Deputy Sheriff.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

53.              Defendant JAN BEAUTZ/Jan Beautz

resides or works at Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Supervisor.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

54.              Defendant ELLEN PIRIE/Ellen Pirie

resides or works at Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Supervisor.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

55.              Defendant NEAL COONERTY/Neal Coonerty

resides or works at Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Supervisor.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

56.              Defendant TONY CAMPOS/Tony Campos

resides or works at Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Supervisor.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

57.              Defendant MARK W.STONE/Mark W.Stone

resides or works at Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Supervisor.

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

58.              Defendant FRED KEELEY/Fred Keeley/County of Santa Cruz Treasurer – Tax Collector.

resides or works at 701 Ocean Str. Room 150, Santa Cruz CA 95060 as County Tax Collector Treasurer

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

59.              Defendant ALLAN GREENSPAN/Allan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve Bank and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

resides or worked at the Federal Reserve Bank as former Chairman of the Federal Rserve Bank 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20551

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

60.              Defendant SHAREHOLDERS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK/ Shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank

resides or work at the Federal Reserve Bank and or other locations, Federal Rserve Bank 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20551

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

61.              Defendant Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

resides at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 101 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94105

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

62.              Defendant Wells Fargo Bank/Wells Fargo Home Mortgage/ Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

resides or works at P.O. Box 6995, Portland OR 97228-6995

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

63.              Defendant Discover Financial Services

resides or works at P.O. Box 30943, Salt Lake City, UT 84130

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

64.              Defendant American Express

resides or works at P.O. Box 981535, El Passo, TX 79998-1531

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

65.              Defendant Bank of America

resides or works at P.O. Box 15716, Wilmington DE 19850-5027

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

Defendant Chase Card Services

resides or works at P.O. Box 15298, Wilmington DE 19850-6600

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

66.              Defendant RBS

resides or works at P.O. Box 7092, Bridgeport, CT 06601-3204

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

67.              Defendant CitiBiusiness Card

resides or works at P.O. Box 44180, Jacksonville FL 32231-4180

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

68.              Defendant Capital One Bank

resides or works at City of Industry, CA 91716-0024

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

69.              Defendant John Does 1 – n (where n is the total number of defendants who’s names are not know at the time of filing)

resides or works at - unknown

The defendant is sued in their (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.

 


 

[1] Judicial Notice: This case is filed under the 11th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.” This suit in law and equity is commenced and prosecuted against the United States and the State of California by Citizens of Nevada, representing another State and Nevis, representing a Foreign State.  Consequentially the 11th Amendment eliminates and prohibits JUDICIAL POWER in this case, all matters may only be adjudicated by JURY POWER.  Furthermore, Due Process dictates an impartial decision maker (see Authorities), hence Judges, who are employees and colleagues of the parties sued in this case, do not qualify as impartial decision makers in this suit.  Consequentially, as in the Grand Jury Process, only an impartial Jury may make any decision what so ever in this case, other than a simple failure to appear of Real Parties of Interest DEFENDANTS, in which case the Clerk of the Court must issue a Summary Judgement pursuant to rules of Court (Title 28, Rule 55 (b)(1)).