Habeas Exhibits
EXHIBITS INDEX Clive Frank Boustred Case #_____________
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.
Exhibits included by reference at http://www.libertyforlife.com/abuse/irwin_joseph.htm
EXHIBIT A: Stipulated Court Orders of August 13, 2002; Judy 12 and 31, 2002 representing a final judgment and the payout of respondent for the home at 210 Suncrest Dr. in August of 2002. Note this is also the only lawful Custody order regarding Petitioner’s children.
EXHIBIT B: U.S. District Court Jan Jose case C08 00546 where IRWIN H. JOSEPH is a primary defendant.
EXHIBIT C: Petitioner Homestead Declaration – The Irwin Joseph eviction order completely disregards the fact that Petitioner is protected under the Homestead Act.
EXHIBIT D: Commissioner Irwin H. Joseph’s first attempt to issue an illegal order to evict Petitioner from his Homestead and office. Note the day the Commissioner orders the eviction is the very day the Commissioner is attempting to have himself dismissed from the lawsuit Petitioner filed against the Commissioner – see Exhibit E. The Sheriffs agreed this order was void. Petitioner provided the court proof of payout of the home to his ex wife in compliance with the July 31, 2002 Stipulated Order.
EXHIBIT D P2: Note eviction date of May 23, 2008 – See Exhibit E where Joseph attempts to have himself dismissed from the case Mr. Boustred is prosecuting against him. Mr. Boustred’s room mate, Amy Miller (who was in critical condition in hospital at the time of the hearing, about which Joseph was noticed), however took the illegal order seriously and moved out of Mr. Boustred’s home as soon as she go out of hospital, Amy died two months later.
EXHIBIT E: U.S. District Court Case C08 00546 where Joseph attempted to have himself dismissed from the case while Petitioner was held under false arrest as a consequence of Joseph’s illegal eviction order.
EXHIBIT F: Commissioner Irwin H. Joseph’s second attempt to issue an order to evict Petitioner from his Homestead. Note the Santa Cruz Sheriffs falsely arrested Petitioner four days before they scheduled a meeting with Petitioner to discuss the order. They held Petitioner on a $200,000 bail while the Commissioner had another hearing in an attempt to have himself dismissed from the case Petitioner filed against the Commissioner. See Exhibit G.
EXHIBIT F P2: Note Petitioner emailed Sheriffs proof that the eviction order was void and that he had paid out is ex in compliance with the Stipulated July 31, 2002 order see Exhibit H. The Sheriffs setup a meeting with Petitioner on the 9th of September to address the issue but then arrested Petitioner on the 6th.
EXHIBIT G: U.S. District Court Case C08 00546 where Joseph attempted to have himself dismissed from the case while Petitioner was held under false arrest with bail set at $200,000 as a consequence of Joseph’s illegal eviction order and an absurd allegation that petitioners email sent to the sheriffs proving that Irwin Joseph’s illegal order was void was some how a threat see Exhibit H.
EXHIBIT H: Email and proof sent to sheriffs that Irwin Joseph’s eviction order was void.
NOTE: The Primary Attachment is Next. The other attachments were contempt charges filed against Petitioner’s ex by Petitioner. One filed the morning before the Sheriffs shot at Petitioner in an attempt to prevent Petitioner’s ex from resuming making false 911 calls. The other filed at a later date. The Sheriffs and Santa Cruz Superior Court completely refused to even hear these verified complaints.
EXHIBIT E: September 11, 2008 - IRWIN H. JOSEPH’s Void Order modifying custody and maliciously ordering Mr. Boustred to not communicate with Mr. Boustred’s children!
EXHIBIT F: September 11, 2008 - IRWIN H. JOSEPH’s Void Order to preclude Petitioner “from providing any evidence, oral or documentary, as to any claim he ahs or may advance regarding this right to be reimbursed by the Respondent relative to any issue.” And Waver of Rule 3.1312
EXHIBIT A
Stipulated Court Orders of August 13, 2002; Judy 12 and 31, 2002 representing a final judgment and the payout of respondent for the home at 210 Suncrest Dr. in August of 2002. Note this is also the only lawful Custody order regarding Petitioner’s children.
EXHIBIT B
U.S. District Court Jan Jose case C08 00546 where IRWIN H. JOSEPH is a primary defendant.
EXHIBIT C
Petitioner Homestead Declaration – The Irwin Joseph eviction order completely disregards the fact that Petitioner is protected under the Homestead Act.
EXHIBIT D
Commissioner Irwin H. Joseph’s first attempt to issue an illegal order to evict Petitioner from his Homestead and office. Note the day the Commissioner orders the eviction is the very day the Commissioner is attempting to have himself dismissed from the lawsuit Petitioner filed against the Commissioner – see Exhibit E. The Sheriffs agreed this order was void. Petitioner provided the court proof of payout of the home to his ex wife in compliance with the July 31, 2002 Stipulated Order.
EXHIBIT D P2: Note eviction date of May 23, 2008 – See Exhibit E where Joseph attempts to have himself dismissed from the case Mr. Boustred is prosecuting against him. Mr. Boustred’s room mate, Amy Miller (who was in critical condition in hospital at the time of the hearing, about which Joseph was noticed), however took the illegal order seriously and moved out of Mr. Boustred’s home as soon as she go out of hospital, Amy died two months later.
EXHIBIT E
U.S. District Court Case C08 00546 where Joseph attempted to have himself dismissed from the case while Petitioner was held under false arrest as a consequence of Joseph’s illegal eviction order.