COMMISSIONER IRWIN H. JOSEPH'S CRIMES
Commissioner IRWIN H. JOSEPH is not a Judge, that means he needs to
get permission to act as a judge from the parties to a Case. The
Court will present the parties with a form to sign where they agree to
accept the Commissioner as a judge. Without that agreement a
Commissioner has as much power making an order as any old Joe.
 On
Jan 24 - 06, Clive filed a Federal Lawsuit listing IRWIN H. JOSEPH as
the primary defendant.
To read the lawsuit directly go here:
InfoTelesys
Lawsuit in Word format:
Clive Frank Boustred
On May 14 - 08, IRWIN H. JOSEPH issued an illegal order to evict
Clive from his Home & Office on May 23 - 08
 On
May 23 - 08 IRWIN H. JOSEPH attempts to have himself dismissed from
the lawsuit Clive filed against him
on the very day he ordered
Clive evicted! Clive and attorney
Kate Wells call the Santa Cruz Sheriffs who agree that the order issued
by IRWIN H. JOSEPH to evict Clive from his home is clearly illegal, they
do nothing.
 On
Aug 27 - 08 IRWIN H. JOSEPH issues a second illegal order evicting
Clive from his home on Sep 2 - 08
Clive and attorney Kate Wells call the Santa Cruz Sheriffs who this
time say they are not sure if the order IRWIN H. JOSEPH issued is legal
or not. Clive sends the Santa Cruz
Sheriffs an extensive email proving well beyond any reasonable
doubt that the order is
illegal and that Clive paid his ex-wife off according to the
Stipulated Order in 2002. The Sheriffs setup an appointment
with Clive on Sep 3, 2008 which the Sheriffs then delayed to September
9, 2008.
 When
Clive went to pick up his children from his ex-wife on Sep 6, 08, a swat
team of Sheriffs arrested Clive claiming that Clive made an unknown
threat on an unknown public official. They set the bail at
$200,000. On Sep 12 - 08 while Clive was under false arrest with
bail set at $200,000 from the illegal eviction order IRWIN H. JOSEPH
issued, JOSEPH had another hearing to get himself dismissed from the
lawsuit Clive was prosecuting against him. Naturally Clive could
not attend the hearing. At the same time the Sheriffs placed Clive under false arrest, they
falsely arrested Clive's friend at Clive's home and held him in jail for
6 hours while they broke into and searched Clive's home breaking into
and stealing Clive's safe's and who know what else. They had no
search warrant nor any right to enter Clive's property.
The Sheriffs claimed that because
Clive drove at 27mph down his
private road before they attempted to
murder Clive in front of his
children on March 10, 2003, that Clive was therefore a felon and
they charged Clive four more felonies for the guns Clive had purchased
legally, increasing the bail to $200,000. Santa Cruz District
Attorney Bob Lee continues to eagerly prosecute the 7th, 8th and 9th
malicious and false cases filed against Clive since the Sheriffs shot at
Clive and his children on March 10, 03. In jail the Sheriffs would
only bring Clive before judges he was suing. On Sep 10, the
Sheriffs brought Clive before Judge Jeff Almquist who is also a
defendant in the lawsuit Clive is prosecuting against Santa Cruz County,
Judge Almquist properly dismisses himself and Clive is sent back to jail
(Later however Judge Almquist steps in to dismiss the Grand Jury
Indictment against Irwin H. Joseph). Despite Clive having been
held well beyond the legal limits, the Sheriffs next bring Clive before
Judge Samuel S. Steven, a long time defendant in the cases Clive is
prosecuting against the unholy cross of Santa Cruz. In the hearing
before Steven's Clive asked to see the Verified Criminal Complaint and
the Grand Jury Indictment (Mandated by the 5th Amendment and due
process), Stevens proceeded to enter a plea for Clive against Clive's
objections and then had the Sheriffs throw Clive back in jail.
While Clive was held in jail IRWIN H. JOSEPH got even more malicious,
without any hearing he issued an order that Clive not communicate
with his children! The Santa Cruz sheriffs and court are
to this very day more than two months later still enforcing the order
that Clive may in no way even communicate with his sons Richard and
William.
Most astonishing in this and many other cases is the behavior of
spouses. It has and is Anamaria Tichatschke, Clive's ex who has in
every instance filed motions to prevent Clive from communicating with
his children, as shown below. The question one must ask is what
drives someone like Anamaria to seek to prevent her children's from even
talking to their father? Clearly Clive is a good man and an
outstanding father, his children are desperate to live with their dad
and do not want to live with their mother. Does Anamaria believe that by
preventing her children from communicating with their father that some
how the children will want to live with her and not their dad?
What is the psychological condition that drives such irrational
behavior? Is Vicky Parry, Anamaria's lawyer, the one driving this
insanity? Vicky Parry destroyed three separate settlement
agreements Anamaria and Clive reached, clearly, the more messed up a
case, the more money a lawyer makes. Is this what 'Family Law' in
Californian Courts is all about "Lots of Attorney Wages"?
  
Anamaria's Motions to prevent Clive from communicating with his
children. These motions were 'heard' without any notice or hearing
by IRWIN H. JOSEPH while Clive was being held under false arrest with
bail set at $200,000 - Clive was simply handed the Order issued by IRWIN
H. JOSEPH barring him from any contact with his children after the fact.
When Clive went to the next hearing following the 'temporary order', the
bailiff prevented Clive from even entering the court and threatened to
arrest Clive, Clive had a Grand Jury Indictment/Presentment for Irwin H.
Joseph:
This case reflects the state of the Californian Courts, the Courts in
the United States of America and the government in the U.S.
Keep up to date on the latest
assault on Clive on this page |
